Pierre Manent, "Tocqueville, Political Philosopher," trans. Arthur Goldhammer in The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville,  ed. Cheryl B. Welch.  (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)

Excerpt:

Since 2002,texts by Tocqueville have been included in the syllabus  for the French Agrégation de Philosophie. What are we to think of this belated promotion of Tocqueville to the rank of  philosopher? Did the sages who draft the syllabi give into the winds of fashion? Or did their selection finally reveal the true nature of the‘‘Norman aristocrat?’’ I shall try to answer this question.
I. A Totally New World
We see Alexis de Tocqueville first of all as a citizen, a politician, and statesman confronting a temporal discontinuity. The old order has been swept away; the new order is not firmly established. If instability and disorder are prevalent in institutions, it is because they already affect men’s souls: ‘‘The laws of moral analogy have… been abolished.’’  If one is to become capable of acting in and on the new society, one must first know it.  But what does it mean‘‘to know the new society?’’ A‘‘new political science’’ of unparalleled prestige already existed,that of Montesquieu.  Benjamin Constant held fast to Montesquieu’s conclusion that the ‘‘modern difference’’ was the difference introduced by the development of commerce and the institution of regular political representation. In a style all his own, Francois Guizot ratified and extended the science of‘‘representative government.’’

Online:
Amazon
Google Books (Preview)